domingo, 27 de enero de 2013


PART 3
For numbers 18-27, give the letters A-G for the type of accident for which this treatment is appropriate.

EMERGENCY TREATMENT

In which accident should you........ ?
18. not touch someone ..........
19. avoid giving someone too much to drink ..........
20. put a blanket under them ..........
21. open the window ..........
22. protect the patient from sunlight ..........
23. drink sterilised water ..........
24. observe the victim’s  breathing carefully ..........
25. not apply medication ..........
26. restrict the circulation of the blood ..........
27. not take away any clothing ..........

A.
Heat Burn
If the victim’s clothing is on fire, make him lie down and try to put out the flames with a rug, blanket
or coat.  Do not remove any clothing from an area which has been burned as this may lead to infection of the burnt area.  Do not wash or apply any cream or paste.  Apply a dry dressing which should
be left exposed, but protect from sunlight.  The belief that air must be completely excluded from a
burn is wrong, as is the practice of applying ointments to the burn.  They may in fact start infection
and destroy any chance of healing without scars.  If there are blisters, do not prick them.


B.
Electrical Burn
If possible, turn off the electric current, or remove the victim from the current.  To do the latter, use
something that does not conduct electricity, such as a dry pole, branch or rope, or with dry clothing.
Do not touch him directly or with anything metallic or wet while he is still in contact with the live
outlet.

C.
Shock
If the burn victim is in shock, lay him on his back and make him comfortable and cover the burn with
a dry dressing.  He should be protected from chilling, but of course there should be no application of
warmth because the raised temperature will increase demand by the tissues for oxygen, which loss
of blood may already have diminished.  The patient should be given nothing to drink unless he cries
out with thirst.  He should be allowed to sip, but not gulp.  If necessary, give the liquid by the spoonful
to avoid gulping.


D.
Snake Bites
If someone bas been bitten by a snake, he should be put on his back, and movement of any sort
should be prevented.  A tourniquet should be applied round the limb between the bite and the heart,
and tightened until the veins stand out.  If the limb becomes blue, loosen the band a little.  Medical
help should be called for.  In the meantime, raise the bitten limb to reduce circulation, and do not cut
or suck the bite or rub anything into it.

E.
Upset Stomach
If the person is sick repeatedly, do not let him eat any solid food for 24 hours.  He should drink only
boiled or bottled water.  If he has constantly to go to the bathroom, he should be given an alkaline
mixture, such as kaolin, obtained from the chemist.  He should take one tablespoonful every four
hours.  If the sickness continues, or returns after 24 hours, consult a doctor.

F.
Exposure
A person suffering from severe and prolonged exposure should be admitted to hospital as soon as
possible.  In the meantime, place blankets both under and over the victim to prevent chilling.  Do not
apply artificial warmth.

G.
Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
Get the victim out of the poisonous atmosphere, or if in a car, open all windows and doors after
turning off the engine.  If you have to enter the poisonous atmosphere, take a deep breath at the last
minute, and do not rush.  If you cannot get the victim out alone or at the first attempt try to get help.
If he is still breathing when he has been removed from the poisonous atmosphere, it is sufficient to
watch him to ensure that breathing continues until medical help arrives.  If he is not breathing apply
artificial respiration at once.  If he is still conscious he will probably recover quite quickly, but watch
him carefully.



Present perfect continuous.

The basics - structure:

The syntax of the structure is: subject + auxiliary verb "have" or "has" + been + verb root + ing:
It has been raining all day.
I've been working here for six months now.

John has been going out with Mary since March last year.

Question forms:

We make inversion between the subject and the auxiliary "have" or "has":
Have you been waiting long?

Has he been watching television since he came home from work?

Negative forms:

We use "not", which combines with the auxiliary to make a negative sentence:
I haven't been jogging recently.

John hasn't been eating well for weeks.

Present perfect continuous - use in real life:

Before reading this, you should have studied present perfect simple 2...
1) Its use may often seem complicated because the wording is similar and so the different meanings are not obvious. Furthermore, both aspects both show a connection to the present:
I've done three English exercises since 6 o'clock.
(He hecho tres ejercicios de inglés desde las seis.)
I've been doing three English exercises since 6 o'clock.
(Estoy haciendo tres ejercicios de inglés desde las seis.)
In the first sentence (simple form), the speaker means that he/she started the three exercises at 6 o'clock and now they are finished. The second sentence, (continuous form) expresses an action that began in the past (at 6 o'clock) and is continuing in the present (and will probably continue into the future).
The idea of finished actions in present perfect simple and continuing actions in present perfect continuous can also be seen in these examples:
I've read your report. It was very interesting. (finished action)
I've been reading your report. It seems very interesting. (continuing action)
2) Furthermore, present perfect continuous can also express actions which are considered temporary:
I've been staying with my parents for a few weeks until I find a job.
...while present perfect simple expresses a more permanent situation:
She's driven the same car all her life.
3) A close link to a present situation can be expressed with present perfect continuous when we see the result of some recently finished action:
- Why are you so hot? - I've been running.
- You're covered in paint! - Yes, I've been painting the house all morning.
In this last case (3), present perfect simple is not possible as an answer because it does not stress the continuity of the action. Let's compare the above with this next example:
(A husband comes in with a broken lamp in his hand. His wife says:) "Oh, no. What have you done?!"
"I've broken the lamp."
In this last example, the wife is also asking about a finished action but one which happens at a moment in time(without stress on the continuity) ie. the lamp broke in an instant.
4) As with other continuous forms of the verbs on English, we should remember that we cannot normally make continuous forms of certain verbs: "have" (possessive), "be", "like", "see" etc. In these cases we use present perfect simple even though the context is a continuing one:
I've had these shoes a week.

It's been cloudy all morning.

I've liked that boy for a long time now.



PART 2
Choose the sentences (A-J) which best fill the gaps (09-17).  There is one extra sentence.

BABY-BEARING GRANDMOTHERS

Severino Antinori is an Italian obstetrician.  Dr Antinori’s claim to fame is not that he is simply one of
the many doctors who provide artificial fertilisation, but that he provides such artificial fertilisation for
women who are long past normal child-bearing age.  For example, in 1992, a 61-year-old widow from
Palermo, Sicily, had a baby.  Dr Antinori had planted in her an egg fertilised with her husband’s
sperm.   09. ......
After 32 years of childless marriage, another Sicilian housewife, Giuseppina Maganuca, had a baby
planted by Antinori at the age of 53.  She said:  “My baby is an angel, and the doctor is a saint... “
Another woman, Anita Blokziel, aged 56, a former circus acrobat from Amsterdam, gave birth to a
baby girl.  Of Antonori, she says:  “The doctor has made me the happiest of women.  10.......

The Catholic church is certain that Dr Antinori is not a performer of miracles. 11.......
The head of the church’s bio-ethical commission has condemned his work as “horrifying”.   12.......
The early work in this field was done by Simon Fishel.  He developed a technique for injecting a
single sperm into the female egg, the ovum. 13.......
According to Dr Fishel, “the only real problem that hasn’t been solved in this area is how old the
woman can be, and how safe the treatment is.  14........
Does this mean that women may continue to have children into their seventies and eighties,  that the
power-women of today may now put off having a family until 2040?  It seems like it.  15.........
It seems that about 30,000 women worldwide are being offered these hi-tech breeding systems.
They spend about $400 million a year.  16.........
The good doctor hit the headlines in Britain after it got into the newspapers that, as a result of his
efforts, an unnamed Englishwoman of 55 was expecting twins in December.  The news was greeted
with scorn and derision in the newspapers, so much so that Dr Antinori has been consulting a London-based libel lawyer.  17.........


A. Nobody has that information

B. It looks as if the granny-mummy, or, as the Italians call
them, le mamme-nonne, is going to be in the headlines for
a few months to come.

C. The whole process should be treated with the contempt it
deserves.

D. In its opinion, he is far more likely to be going to hell  than
heaven.

E. After taxes and overheads,  Dr Antinori’s clinic makes
$600,000 a year clear profit.

F. This technique has been combined with a hormone
treatment which rejuvenates the baby-carrying parts of
older women.

G. He has given me a miracle.

H. The Catholic press considers that he is creating
“prefabricated orphans” in that the parents will die before
their children have grown up or even left school.
I. According to Dr Antinori, he had been contacted by a
representative of CNN chairman Ted Turner, who wanted
to know if the saintly doctor would treat his wife, the
55-year-old Jane Fonda.

J. Her husband had died in 1985, but his sperm had been
frozen before his death.




THE ENGLISH SPEAKER TEST 000
EXAMINATION PREPARATION EXERCISES: FIRST CERTIFICATE
Paper 3:  Reading TIME: 1 hour
PART 1: COMPREHENSION
Choose the answers you think fit best according to the text.

HAIR TODAY, GONE TOMORROW
“I started to lose my hair when I was 16.  It kept on falling out and my confidence went. The other
blokes had great mops of hair.  It was the fashion in the Seventies.  By the time I was 21 it was so
bad that, when I saw this ad in the paper for a private hair clinic, I went along.  I asked them how
much hair they thought I would lose and they said probably just a little at the corners, and they could
fill it in with some hair grafts.
“With these hair grafts I had to have a local anaesthetic. It was so painful.  They took bits of hair from
the side and back, and replanted them into cuts made in the balding patch.  The operation is very
unpleasant, especially when the anaesthetic needles are stuck into your scalp.  But more hair fell
out, and I need more grafts. Over the next three years, I had more grafts, but it couldn’t keep up with
the hair loss.  I had all these implants in front, and a bald patch behind.  It looked worse than before
and my life was falling apart.
“My engagement was called off.  My fiancee never commented about my hair, but I just didn’t feel
worthy of her.  I was so fed up I went to another clinic.  This time a salesman “consultant” came to
my home.  He suggested more grafts, and something called a scalp reduction.  I had four of these
operations over the next eighteen months.  A piece of skin was taken from my scalp, and the skin on
either side was lifted and pulled inwards to be joined together with stitches.  I had to have a week off
work after each operation because I couldn’t even smile.  Even now my head feels tight around my
temples.
“This time I felt better, and looked better.  But the hair loss persisted.  It left patches and gaps.  All
the time the clinic kept promising me a full head of hair.  I was drinking heavily.  Sometimes as many
as nine pints of beer a night, seven nights a week.  It was the only way I could relax and feel confident with girls.  I became so depressed that I was sent to see a psychiatrist.
“But I kept on with the grafts.  This was at the same clinic.  In the end I developed scars that wouldn’t
go away.  They tried twice at the clinic to scrape the scar tissue away, but each time the scars
returned.  Then they tried steroid injections, but that didn’t work either.  Then I started to really worry
about the hair at the back of my head.  I’d had so many grafts that it had been severely thinned
down.”  [At this point, not surprisingly, the specialists at the clinic decided there was nothing more
they could do.  They did, however, recommend an expensive hair growth lotion.  It had no effect.]
“If only someone had listened to me.  I feel cheated.  Not just financially.  I lost my youth living in a
limbo, hopping from transplant to transplant.  I would give anything to be able to walk down the street
with long hair blowing in the wind.
“I mean, things are better now.  I have a doctor who has got me off the steroids and tranquillisers I
was taking.  Then I have cut down on my drinking.  I have a girlfriend who is sympathetic, and we get
along really well with each other.  But, I don’t know, it won’t go away.  Only a few months ago, I
ordered an expensive wig from another clinic, and then cancelled.  I still have to use this spray-on
scar camouflage and a hair thickener every morning.  I cut my own hair.  I mean, I just couldn’t go to
a hairdresser.  And I always wear a hat when I’m out of doors.”

01. Why did he choose this hair clinic?
A. It advertised.
B. His hair was falling out.
C. His friends had a lot of hair.
D. He wanted to be in fashion.

02. The implant operations were not successful because
A. in the end his hair looked unnatural.
B. his life was going to pieces.
C. of the anaesthetic.
D. he needed more grafts.

03. He had this tight feeling at the side of his head because
A. his girlfriend had left him.
B. he couldn’t smile.
C. hair had been implanted..
D. skin had been taken away.

04. He could only feel confident if he
A. had a full head of hair.
B. took steroids.
C. drank to excess.
D. saw a psychiatrist.

05. What did he develop after so many operations?
A. deep depression.
B. permanent scars.
C. thin hair.
D. a steroid dependence.

06. When they decided there was nothing more they could do, the specialists
A. gave him his money back.
B. offered him free cosmetics.
C. sold him a liquid hair restorer.
D. advised him to massage his head.

07. Looking back, he felt he
A. should have had better advice.
B. had wasted his youth.
C. had been very foolish.
D. had been unlucky.

08. At the present time, he
A. has made a complete recovery.
B. is self-conscious about his hair.
C. is dependent on his girl-friend.
D. visits a hairdresser regularly.

miércoles, 23 de enero de 2013


"Going to" para futuro.

Lo básico - la estructura:

Podemos emplear "going to" como auxiliar para expresar futuro. Su forma requiere la presencia del auxiliar "to be":
Sujeto + to be + going to + infinitivo.
I am going to study more English. (Voy a estudiar más inglés.)
John and Mary are going to get married. (John y Mary se van a casar.)

La forma interrogativa:

Como casi siempre, hay inversión entre el sujeto y el auxiliar "to be" en las preguntas:
Are you going to watch the match? (¿Vas a ver el partido?)
Is Dave going to look for a new job? (¿Dave va a buscar un trabajo nuevo?)

La forma negativa:

Empleamos la palabra "not":
I'm not going to go on holiday. (No voy a ir de vacaciones.)
We aren't going to drive to Madrid. (No vamos a conducir a Madrid.)

Going to - el uso en la vida real:

Los planes.

Empleamos "going to" para hablar de nuestras intenciones o planes para el futuro, es decir, decisiones ya tomadas:
I'm going to get my hair cut tomorrow. (Me voy a cortar el pelo mañana.)
John and Mary are going to buy a house in the country next year. (John y Mary van a comprar una casa en el campo el año que viene.)
We're going to start eating more healthily next month. (El mes que viene vamos a empezar a comer más sano.)
Esta manera de hablar del futuro, en muchos casos, puede sustituirse por presente continuo para futuro. Este último también habla del futuro:
I'm seeing Rocío this evening.
I'm going to see Rocío this evening. (Voy a ver a Rocío esta noche.)
Pero hay que separar presente continuo para futuro y "going to" si la intención futura no queda clara. Esto puede pasar si el adverbio que expresa futuro es ausente:
They're watching a film. (Están viendo un peli, o, Van a ver una peli.)
They're going to watch a film. (Van a ver una peli.)
Si queremos poner mucho énfasis en nuestra intención, por ejemplo, para expresar que estamos empeñados en hacer algo, preferimos "going to":
I'm going to pass this exam if it's the last thing I do. (Voy a aprobar este examen aunque sea la última cosa que haga.)
y no... "I'm passing this exam..."

Predicciones para el futuro.

"Going to" (y no presente continuo para futuro) se utiliza para hablar de lo que pensamos que va a pasar en el futuro. Normalmente, esta predicción está basada en lo que experimentamos en el presente, por ejemplo, lo que vemos:
Look at that plane! It's going to crash! (¡Mira el avión! ¡Va a estallar!)
Look at those clouds. It's going to rain. (Mira esas nubes. Va a llover.)
Look at Mary. She's going to have a baby. (Mira a Mary. Va a tener un hijo.)

Amenazas y promesas.

También son decisiones ya tomadas cuando expresamos promesas o amenazas. "Going to" (y no presente continuo para futuro) se utiliza en esto casos:
I promise I'm not going to do it ever again. (Prometo que no volveré a hacerlo nunca más.)
If you do that, I'm going to get angry. (Si haces eso, me voy a enfadar.)
He's going to pay for what he did. (Lo que ha hecho me lo va a pagar.)


Five-minute Spanish Lessons - comparing the two languages. Lesson 3.

Talking about the weather.

It is an anecdote that the British talk more about the weather than any other nationality. This could be because the weather provides a lot to talk about in the British Isles! Let's compare weather phrases between English and Spanish.
Most weather statements in English begin with the subject "It" and the verb used is usually "to be" or "there is / are" while in Spanish the verb is usually "hacer", "estar" or "haber" ("hay" etc.):
What's the weather like today?
¿Qué tiempo hace hoy?
or,
¿Cómo está el tiempo?
It's very cold and cloudy
Hace mucho frío y está nublado
There was a lot of mist on the road yesterday
Ayer había bastante neblina en la carretera
If it's not fine tomorrow, that'll mean the excursion to the mountains is off
Si no hace buen tiempo mañana, se acabó la excursión a la sierra
What awful weather in Scotland; it doesn't stop snowing
Qué mal tiempo hace en Escocia; no deja de nevar
It's been lovely weather throughout the whole holiday
Ha hecho un tiempo precioso durante todas la vacaciones 
or,
We've had lovely weather...
El tiempo ha estado precioso...
Also possible is:
Nos ha hecho un tiempo precioso...
However, as is usual with "ser" and "estar" the latter talks about changing events whereas "ser" is used when we talk about what is usual:
Últimamente, el tiempo ha estado fatal con lluvias y humedad.
Qué raro, normalmente el tiempo / el clima es bueno aquí.
Lately, the weather's been terrible with rain and damp.
How strange, the weather / the climate is usually good here.
Let's just compare the tenses of "to be" / "hacer" for talking about the weather:
It + be + adjectiveHacer + noun
It's sunny today
(continuous not possible in English with verb "to be")
It's being sunny
Hace sol hoy
But also possible in Spanish is the continuos:
Está haciendo sol
It's been sunny all weekHa hecho sol toda la semana
It was sunny yesterdayHacía sol ayer
or,
Hizo sol
It'll be sunny tomorrow
or,
It's going to be sunny tomorrow
Habrá sol mañana
or,
Va ha haber sol mañana
It may / might / could be sunny tomorrowPuede que haga sol mañana
Differences in use of 'weather words' are the following not to confuse:
It was scorching / sweltering all day but now it's cooled off
Ha hecho un calor sofocante todo el día pero ahora ha refrescado
It's very humid in Florida
Es muy húmedo en Florida
but,
It's damp and cold in Britain at Christmas
Es húmedo y frío en Gran Bretaña en Navidades
(so, "humid" in English is usually just used when it's hot)
Another interesting word for "humid" or "damp" is "muggy"
I'm fed up with this muggy weather
Estoy harto de este tiempo bochornoso
The day's become very overcast
El día se ha puesto muy cubierto / nublado
I finish with the wisdom of some weather proverbs:
English...
Red sky in the morning: shepherd's warning.
Red sky at night: shepherd's delight.
(which means that if the morning sky is red, it's going to rain that day but if the sky is red when at sunset, the next day is going to be fine)
The Spanish have a proverb for the second part:
El cielo rojo por la noche anuncia buen tiempo
Make the best of a bad job 
Al mal tiempo buena cara
Spain has weather proverbs for each month of the year. here are two...
Hasta el 14 de mayo no te quites el sayo
(Don't take off your cape until 14th May as the weather can still get cold)
En febrero, busca la sombra el perro; y en marzo, su amo.
(It gets hot enough in Spain in February for a dog to look for shade and in March his master does the same.)

Five-minute Spanish Lessons - comparing the two languages. Lesson 15.

Relative Pronouns I

Who, which, that /
el cual, la cual, los cuales, las cuales, quien, quienes, que, el que, la que

What is a relative pronoun?

These words, we call relative pronouns, are used to join two sentences or two ideas into one sentence:
Two sentences:
Tarzan is sitting in a tree. He likes Jane
Tarzán está sentado en un árbol. A él le gusta Jane
One sentence:
Tarzan, who is sitting in a tree, likes Jane
A Tarzán, que está sentado en un árbol, le gusta Jane
Let's look at some rules for using relative pronouns in English and then compare them to the rules for the use of their Spanish equivalents.
The phrases made with relative pronouns are called relative clauses. There are two types of relative clause:
1) Identifying relative clauses
(also called defining or restrictive relative clauses)
2) Non-identifying relative clauses
(Also called non-defining or non-restrictive relative clauses)
By identifying relative clauses we mean a sentence which does exactly that. It identifies a noun within the clause. Let's consider the following sentences (I have underlined the possible relative pronouns - but will discuss these pronouns in the next lesson):
The people that / who saw the accident were shocked
La gente que vio el accidente quedó aturdida
The trees that / which are suffering from the disease are going to be cut down
Los árboles que sufren de la enfermedad serán talados
The boy that / who helps in the shop is off sick
El chico que trabaja en la tienda está de baja por enfermedad
In the first sentence, who were shocked? Clearly, the people that / who saw the accident - La gente que vio el accidente. We are identifying the group of people who / that were shocked. In the second example, we are identifying which trees are to be cut down: those that / which have the disease. And in the third example we have identified who is off sick: the boy that / who helps in the shop. - El chico que trabaja en la tienda.
In fact, if we take out the middles part of each sentence: eg,: that / who saw the accident - que vio el accidente, so we are left with:
The people were shocked - La gente quedó aturdida
We don't know which people - (qué gente) we are talking about. So that's why the clause: The people that / who saw the accident - La gente que vio el accidente is an identifying relative clause.
Now let's take a look at the same sentences but this time modified by commas and I have also changed the nouns the relative pronouns refer to (antecedents) to make the examples clearer (again I have underlined the possible relative pronouns):
My friends, who saw the accident, were shocked
Mis amigas, que / quienes / las cuales vieron el accidente, quedaron aturdidas
Those beautiful trees, which are suffering from the disease, are going to be cut down
Esos preciosos árboles, que / los cuales sufren de la enfermedad, serán talados
John, who helps in the shop, is off sick
Juan, que / quien / el cual trabaja en la tienda, está de baja por enfermedad
In the first example, we are not identifying who saw the accident. The speaker is talking about his friends. But we have added some extra information about my shocked friends. The extra information is that they saw an accident. In the second example, we already know which trees the speaker is referring to: those beautiful trees - Esos preciosos árboles. The extra information is that they are suffering from desease. Similarly, we have already identified John - Juan and we are also told he works in the shop. So these phrases are called non-identifying relative clauses.
In other words the phrase:
John, who helps in the shop (non-identifying)
Juan, que / quien / el cual trabaja en la tienda (non-identifying)
does not identify which John - Juan we are referring to; just that a John - Juan works in the shop. However:
John that / who helps in the shop (identifying)
Juan que trabaja en la tienda (identifying)
is specifying which John we are talking about:
You know the John I mean. The John that works in the shop
Tú conoces al Juan al que me refiero. El Juan que trabaja en la tienda.
So what! Well, the correct use of relative pronouns depends on which type of clause is being spoken.

Five-minute Spanish Lessons - comparing the two languages. Lesson 13.

Relative Pronouns (2)

Who, which, that /
el cual, la cual, los cuales, las cuales, quien, quienes, que, el que, la que

Identifying relative clauses:

Who or that are used when the antecedent (the noun they refer to) is a person. Either is possible. However, that is probably more common in spoken English and who is preferable in formal written English. Who and that are invariable with number. Note that in Spanish there is really only one possibility: the very versatile que which neither changes with number or gender.
That's the man (the woman) who / that sells the entrance tickets to the cathedral
Ése (Ésa) es el hombre (la mujer) que vende las entradas para la catedral
(Formal written instructions)
Purchasers who have no password should apply for one
Los compradores que no tienen contraseña deben solicitarla
When the antecedent is a thing, English allows which or that in speech and informal writing though often prefers which in formal written style. However, although which may be grammatically possible in speech that is much more common. Spanish still uses que in this type of sentence:
- Excuse me, waiter
- Yes, madam
- The snails that you gave us are disgusting. (which is possible)
- Oiga, camarero
- Sí, señora
- Los caracoles que nos ha dado son asquerosos.
(In formal letter asking for employment)
I am interested in the position which appeared in El País on Sunday 30th May.
Estoy interesado en el puesto que apareció en El País el domingo 30 de mayo.
After words: all, none, little, few, much, only, everything, something, anything, nothing, and in superlative sentences that is used in spoken and usually in written English too:
This is all that I could find
Esto es todo lo que he encontrado
(Note preference for lo que with todo. More discussion of lo que later)
None that I know
Ninguno que yo conozco
The little that you have done has helped a lot
Lo poco que has hecho ha servido de gran ayuda
There wasn't much that I could do
No había mucho que pudiera hacer
Money is the only thing that matters
El dinero es lo único que importa
There's nothing that can be done
No hay nada que se puede hacer
This is the best book that I've ever read
Este es el mejor libro que he leído

Five-minute Spanish Lessons - comparing the two languages. Lesson 14.

Relative Pronouns (3).

Who, which, that /
el cual, la cual, los cuales, las cuales, quien, quienes, que, el que, la que

I continue with the theme of identifying relative clauses from Wednesday. Now let's look at some peculiarities.
In English the relative pronoun is often left out if it is the object of an identifying relative clause:
I can't find the sausages that /which my mother gave me yesterday
or,
I can't find the sausages my mother gave me yesterday
No encuentro las salchichas que mi madre me dio ayer
She's the person who / that I don't what to get to know
or,
She's the person I don't what to get to know
Ella es la persona que yo no quiero llegar a conocer
Anything that you do is fine by me
or,
Anything you do is fine by me
Cualquier cosa que haga, por mí no hay problema
Either version is equally correct grammatically but the omission of the pronoun is very frequent in spoken and informal written English. But note this is when the relative pronoun is the object of the clause. ie,: my mother gave me the sausages (object); I don't want to get to know her (object); you do anything (object).
The omission of the relative pronoun is not possible in Spanish.
So that:
No encuentro las salchichas mi madre me dio ayer
...is NOT possible but must read...
No encuentro las salchichas que mi madre me dio ayer
English also allows a gerund (verb + ing) to replace a relative pronoun yet Spanish cannot do this in these following sentences:
There was a drawer that contained socks
or,
There was a drawer containing socks
Había un cajón que contenía calcetines
and not,
Había un cajón conteniendo calcetines
What you've said is a reply amounting to a refusal
Lo que has dicho es una respuesta que equivale a una negativa
However, you should not get confused here with the use of continuous tenses, which do allow a gerund in Spanish:
There were children who were playing in the street
or,
There were children playing in the street
Había niños que jugaban / estaban jugando en la calle
or,
Había niños jugando en la calle
Learners of English may get confused with constructions like the following because the preposition comes at the end of the clause:
The room (that / which) he was sitting in was very nice
El cuarto en el que estaba sentado era muy bonito
The girls (who / that) I work with sit around all day painting their nails
Las chicas con las que trabajo pasan el día sentadas pintándose las uñas
However, this is the colloquial style of English these days where prepositions fall at the end in examples such as the above. In formal English of today and colloquial English of 50 years ago, the following is / was possible:
The room in which he was sitting was very nice.
The girls with whom I work sit around all day painting their nails.
Whom  is used when who falls after a preposition. (That cannot be used after a preposition in a relative clause.) This form is closer to the Spanish syntax of con que but is rarely heard these days.
Learners of Spanish should note that que is often (though not always) used alone (ie. without el / la / los / las, which I'll talk about later) after the prepositions discussed in the examples below:
After the preposition a (but not when the antecedent is a person):
El libro a que me refiero es muy bueno
The book (that / which) I'm referring to is very good
but,
La persona al que / a quien dio una paliza está en el hospital
The person (that / who) he gave a hiding to is in hospital
After con (but not when the antecedent is a person):
Los ingredientes con que se hace una tortilla están en el armario
The ingredients (that / which) you make an omelette with are in the cupboard
After de: (but not when it means "from"):
Los acontecimientos de que tengo noticia son estos
The only events (that) I know about are these
And after en (but not when it means "inside"):
La manera en que lo dijo me dejó pasmado
The way (that / in which) he said it left me flabbergasted
**Note, learners of English, that "preposition + that" is not possible in relative clauses. We must use which, which can also be omitted as it refers to the object:
The way in that (in which) he said it left me flabbergasted
Learners of Spanish note that en que is often used when antecedent is a period of time.
Learners of English should note that when the antecedent refers to a time ( (eg.: night / day / month) English speakers usually choose that instead of which. However, again, in the examples below that can be omitted.
La noche (en) que vino a verme...
The night (that) he came to see me...
Yet, only que is usually used with the time words: momento, día, semana, mes, año,
El día que llegó mi hermana se puso a llover
The day (that) my sister arrived it started to rain
El mes que ocurrió...
The month (that) it happened in...

Five-minute Spanish Lessons - comparing the two languages. Lesson 12.

Relative Pronouns (4).

Who, which, that /
el cual, la cual, los cuales, las cuales, quien, quienes, que, el que, la que

We'll, now let's look at non-identifying relative clauses (also called non-defining or non-restrictive relative clauses).
This is where we do not identify the antecedent (the noun the relative pronoun refers to) but add complementary information. The difference is important to note as the meaning can change depending on the punctuation of the relative clause.
Taxi drivers who / that drink are a danger on the roads
Los conductores de taxi que beben son un peligro en la carretera
(identifying relative clause)
Taxi drivers, who drink, are a danger on the roads
Los conductores de taxi, que beben, son un peligro en la carretera
(non-identifying relative clause)
The first sentence states that the only dangerous taxi drivers are those who / that drink. The second is insulting because it says ALL taxi drivers drink!
Note that in Spanish and English a non-identifying clause must have commas separating the clause from the rest of the sentence. In English, only who can be used with reference to people and only which with reference to things and abstract nouns, ie.: non-human antecedents; that is not possible.
In Spanish, que, quien or el cual (plus other variations: la cual, los cuales, las cuales) can be used in non-identifying clauses when referring to people and all the above except for quien when the referring to an object or abstract noun. No accent is placed on these relative pronouns. Here are some examples:
My father, who is much better now, has started jogging again
Mi padre, que / quien / el cual / está mucho mejor, ha vuelto a hacer footing
The old, rusty car, which they found in the ditch, had been there for weeks
El viejo coche oxidado, que / el cual encontraron en la cuneta, llevaba allí varias semanas
The bells, which were restored last year, now chime every quarter
Las campanas, que / las cuales fueron restauradas el año pasado, tocan todos los cuartos
After prepositions, Spanish also uses el que / la que / los que / las que also for human or non-human antecedents. (Que by itself after prepositions is only used in the few exceptions I talked about in the lesson relative pronouns III.) In colloquial Spanish these are preferable to el cual and its variants. Learners should note, once more, the preference for the preposition at the end of the clause:
Una amiga, con la que / con quien pasé un fin de semana, me ha escrito
A friend, who I spent a weekend with, has written to me
Dos chicos de Sevilla, por los que / por quienes se enteró Juan del partido de fútbol, le dieron una entrada gratis
Two lads from Seville, who he found out about the football match from, gave him a free pass
Yo fui por el vino, con el cual no tardé en despachar la salchicha
I went for the wine, which I didn't take long to finish the sausage off with
However, learners of Spanish should note that el cual and its variants are used frequently in the following situations. These relative pronouns are reserved for more formal Spanish. And it is often used after según (according to):
El Alcalde de Paysmuga, según el cual la presencia de tanta basura no causa problemas, tiene sus días contados en el ayuntamiento
The Mayor of Paysmuga, according to whom the presence of so much rubbish is not a problem, is on borrowed time in the Town Hall
(Note the necessary yet formal whom when who falls after a preposition.)
Learners of English note that many native speakers talking colloquially would avoid the "whom" structure and re-structure the sentence:
The Mayor of Paysmuga, who believes the presence of so much rubbish is not a problem, is on borrowed time in the Town Hall
El cual is, in fact, fairly common after long prepositions of more than one syllable or more than one word: para / mediante / a pesar de / detrás de etc.
Las lluvias torrenciales, a pesar de las cuales pude llegar a mi trabajo, han dejado las carreteras inundadas.
The torrential rain, despite which I still managed to get to work in, left the roads flooded. (formal English)
As in the previous example, the colloquial version of this sentence may avoid the preposition + which structure:
Despite the torrential rain, which left the roads flooded, I still managed to get to work
or,
The torrential rain, which I still managed to get to work in, left the roads flooded.

Five-minute Spanish Lessons - comparing the two languages. Lesson 11.

Relative Pronouns (5).

Who, which, that /
el cual, la cual, los cuales, las cuales, quien, quienes, que, el que, la que

Here are some more points to note about relative pronouns and relative clauses:
There may be more than one noun in the phrase before the relative pronoun. In English, this may lead to some confusion as to which noun the pronoun is referring to.
I want to watch a film at the cinema, which I like very much
In correct English, the antecedent (the word that the relative pronoun refers to) should always come directly before the relative pronoun. So, in this case, the speaker should be talking about the cinema and not a film. This rule should especially be remembered in written English. However, in spoken English this rule is often ignored and the speaker could be talking about the cinema or a film. This means such a sentence may be ambiguous; does he like the cinema or the film? Spanish has a way of dealing with this possible ambiguity:
I want to watch a film at the cinema, which I like very much
Quiero ver una peli en el cine, que / el cual / me gusta mucho
I want to watch a film at the cinema, which I like very much
Quiero ver una peli en el cine, la cual me gusta mucho
In the first example, we assume the speaker is referring to el cine because que (like which) should immediately follow the antecedent. However, the use of el cual here makes the meaning much clearer as only el cine is masculine. So el cual and not que is preferred if there is possible ambiguity. In the second example la cual must be referring to una peli (feminine). The use of el cual / la cual etc. does not mean this is formal Spanish when used in this case.
There is another point here. A relative pronoun may also refer to a whole phrase:
The girl walked up to me and gave me a letter / that / which / made me quiver with joy
or,
The girl walked up to me and gave me a letter, which made me quiver with joy
Se me acercó la chica y me entregó una carta, lo que / lo cual / me hizo temblar de emoción
The first sentence in English (identifying relative clause - without commas) uses that (or which), which refer to a letter. ie.: a letter made him quiver with joy. The second sentence in English could mean, depending on context, a reference to a letter OR the complete action of: "The girl walked up to me and gave me a letter". In other words, the action of the girl coming up to me and giving me the letter made me quiver with joy. However, I should add that context usually makes meaning clear:
Spanish avoids any posible ambiguity by using lo que or lo cual when referring to a complete phrase. Note, that as the antecedent is a phrase or an idea there is no feminine or plural forms; lo que and lo cual are neutral.
He had a thoughtful expression, which was strange in him
Tenía una expresión pensativa, lo que / lo cual / en él era insólito
Both lo que and el cual can be used after prepositions:
They are different on each occasion, due to which it is difficult to recognize them at a glance
Son diferentes en cada ocasión, por lo que / por lo cual / resulta difícil de reconocerlos a simple vista
Learners of English should remember that what or that are impossible in the above examples. Compare: what is used to refer to an idea (complete clause) but it doesn't refer to an antecedent.
How can you be so cold after what we've lived through?
¿Cómo puede ser tan frío después de lo que hemos vivido?
They didn't think about what would come next
No pensaban en lo que vendría luego
Note that here what, in these last two examples, does not refer to the previous clause.

Five-minute Spanish Lessons - comparing the two languages. Lesson 10.

Relative Pronouns (6).

Who, which, that /
el cual, la cual, los cuales, las cuales, quien, quienes, que, el que, la que

Non-identifying clauses.

The following words in English can be used with of whom and of which: some, any, both, several, enough, many, (much with which), few, none and all. In these structures we cannot use that or who, however, many speakers may choose a more informal way of expressing themselves. Translations in Spanish may vary but the direct translation: de los cuales / de las cuales (del cual or de la cual with non-plural much) is usually possible though note exceptions below. Here are some possible translations:
There were two people at the bar, both of whom spoke perfect German
(or, more informally)
There were two people at the bar, who both spoke perfect German
Había dos personas en la barra, ambas hablaban un alemán perfecto
(or, more informally as ambos is quite formal)
Había dos personas en la barra, las dos hablaban un alemán perfecto
(but rarely heard is: ambas de las cuales)
He asked the passengers on the bus, none of whom had any change
(or, more informally)
He asked the passengers on the bus, but there was nobody who had any change
Preguntó a los pasajeros en el autobus, ninguno de los cuales tenía cambio
(or, more informally)
Preguntó a los pasajeros en el autobus, ninguno tenía cambio
Patients suffering from these illnesses are given archaic drugs, some of which are highly toxic.
Los pacientes que sufren estas enfermedades reciben tratamiento con
medicamentos arcaicos, algunos de los cuales son muy tóxicos.
or, ...medicamentos arcaicos, algunos de ellos son muy tóxicos.
There are about 180,000 European businesses, many of which are small and medium-sized enterprises.
Hay alrededor de 180.000 empresas europeas, muchas de las cuales son pequeñas y medianas.
Hay alrededor de 180.000 empresas europeas, en gran parte pequeñas y medianas.
The city has a lot of pollution, much of which comes from car exhaust fumes
La ciudad tiene bastante contaminación, gran parte de la cual viene de los gases de los tubos de escape
(rarely heard is: mucha de la cual)
If we have a preposition plus a relative pronoun, this can be followed by an infinitive in English:
The children haven't got a garden in which to play
Los niños no tiene jardín en el que jugar
or,
Los niños no tiene jardín para jugar
but a more informal style in English would be:
The children haven't got a garden to play in
The twins didn't have a friend with whom to play (very formal and old-fashioned)
Los gemelos no tenían un amigo con quien jugar
less formal in English would be:
The twins didn't have a friend to play with
Finally, notice how in English a relative clause usually has a third person singular verb although the subject is I (me) or singular you:
It's me who wants to watch the football tonight
(Note that in Spanish, verb agreement may be in first or third person in these two examples.)
Soy yo el que quiero / el que quiere / ver el fútbol esta noche
You're the one who does it, Paco
Tú eres el que lo haces, Paco / Tú eres el que lo hace, Paco
In formal and literary style you may note in English:
It is I who want to watch the football tonight
That is, the verb agrees with the subject and there is the use of it is I rather than it's me.
It is I who am complaining (literary)
(Soy yo el que / me quejo / se queja)
The informal plural vosotros requires the 2nd person agreement in Spanish:
Vosotros sois los que vais a pagar (not: los que van...)
You're the ones who are going to pay


La gramática inglesa: los pronombres personales con dos complementos.


Se suele ordenar la frase: objeto directo + objeto indirecto con 'to' delante del objeto indirecto.
I gave it (masc.) to him/her/you/them
Se lo di
John gave the bunch of flowers to the pretty girl.
John dio el ramo de flores a la chica guapa
Pero si los dos complementos son pronombres, es posible invertir los complementos...

I gave him it
Se lo di
I gave it to him / her / you / them
Se la di
I told him / her
Se lo dije a él/a ella
I told you
Te lo dije
I told you / them
Se lo dije a usted(es) / a ellos(as)
I told you
Os lo dije
They gave them to him / her / you / them
Se los dieron
We gave them to him / her / you / them
Se las dimos
  

Five-minute Spanish Lessons - comparing the two languages. Lesson 1.

You / Tú, Vosotros /as, Vos, Usted, Ustedes (1)


Learners of English often find it strange but there is only one way to address the person, animal (or thing) we are talking to: "you":
We should like to invite you to a small inauguration party with wine and light snacks. (Formal invitation to business client)
Nos complace invitarle a una pequeña fiesta de inauguración con vino y tapas (Spanish "usted" formal)
Do you want to come out for a drink, John?
¿Te apetece salir a tomar una copa, John? (Spanish "tú" informal)
Come over to the grass, Fido; you can't do your business here!
Ven aquí al césped, Lucky; ¡aquí no puedes hacer caca! (Spanish "tú" informal)
Right, tele. I've had it up to here with you! Work now or I'll rip out your cathode ray tubes!
Vale, tele. ¡Se acabó! Funciona ya o te arranco los tubos de rayos catódicos. (Very informal "tú"!)
Exceptions must be when talking to royalty but I shall not go into that in depth for the rare occasions most students have to practise this:
Would you like another cup of tea Your Majesty?
¿Quiere su Majestad tomar otra taza de té?
Learners of Spanish need to be aware of all the possibilities of address and (unfortunately) learn all the accompanying verb forms!
"Tú" is used widely in Spain when you are on a first name basis, or to children and animals. Spanish children usually call adults "tú". But "usted" (formal) is reserved for situations between adults in daily situations such as contact with strangers or respect to older people:
(Adult shouts at a child in the street)
Hey, kid! You can't play with your ball round here!
¡Oye, tú, niño! ¡No puedes jugar a la pelota por aquí! (informal)
(Adult to adult. To know who is the last in a queue in the bank etc.)
Are you the last in the queue?
¿Usted es el último, señor? (formal)
(Buying a lottery ticket in Spain)
Have you got one that finishes in a three?
¿Tiene uno que termina en tres? (formal)
I'm sorry, madam. But I've only got left one with forty-seven
Usted, perdone, señora. Pero sólo me queda el cuarenta y siete
In South America "usted" is more widely used than in Spain. Rules of use vary from country to country but children usually call adults "usted" and in some cases even speak to their parents with "usted". In some South American countries such as Argentina, "vos" may replace "tú" in the informal style. Though the object pronoun is still "te" and the possessive adjective "tu":
I'm going to report you. I'm fed up with you and your dog around here.
Te voy a denunciar. Es que estoy harto de vos y tu perro por acá
"Vos", in South America, usually takes another verb form other than the "tu" or "usted" forms. Though these verb forms may differ from region to region so these are best learnt in the country you are visiting:
Marta, my love. You are the joy of my heart
Marta de mi vida, vos sos la alegría de mi corazón (Argentina)
The plural informal form "vosotros" ("vosotras" - feminine) is heard mostly in Spain and rarely in South America, where "ustedes" is usually used.
Are you coming to see me this weekend? You can come by car.
¿Venís (vosotras) a verme este fin de semana? Podéis venir en coche. (Spain)
¿Vienen (ustedes) a verme...? Pueden venir... (South America)
Learning the "usted" and "ustedes" verb forms is made easier if the student remembers that they coincide with the third person, eg,: él/ella and ellos/ellas:
(Chairman in a formal business meeting. "Como verán" also = They will see)
You will see there are three points on the agenda
Como verán, el orden del día tiene tres puntos
However, note that the Spanish use "you" when somebody identifies himself/herself when behind a door, on the phone or anywhere they cannot be seen. This may sound strange for English speakers:
(On the phone)
- Hello, Mary
- Sorry, who is this? / who is it?  (In Spanish, "who are you?")
- It's me, Jane. (In Spanish, "I'm me")
- Oh, hello, Jane. How are you?

- Hola, Mary
- Perdone, ¿quién es (usted)? / ¿quién eres (tú)?
- Soy yo, Jane
- Hola, Jane. ¿Qué tal? 

Five-minute Spanish Lessons - comparing the two languages. Lesson 39.

You / Tú, Vosotros /as, Vos, Usted, Ustedes (2)

In this lesson we are going to look at some uses of the above words in interesting colloquial expressions in Spanish and English.
"You" can be used to mean your style or your personality:
Those glasses aren't you. They're too bright
Esas gafas no te favorecen. Son demasiado llamativas
I'm surprised you swore at that poor woman. That's not like you to do that
Me sorprende que soltaste una palabrota delante de esa pobre mujer. No sueles decir esas cosas.
And talking of insults; in English it's common to place "you" before a noun or adjective + noun (often) when insulting somebody but not in Spanish:
You prat! (Br.E)
You jerk! (Am.E)
¡Imbécil! (General)
¡Gilipollas! (Spain)
¡Pendejo /a! (S.Am)
You silly nincompoop!
(Not as strong as the above expressions.)
¡Papanatas!
Also, for endearment:
I love you! You beautiful thing you!
(Note the possible repetition of "you" at the end.)
Te quiero! ¡Eres la cosa más linda!
Similarly, in English we can call to others using "you". This may be possible in Spanish too:
Hey, you! Shut up and get out!
¡Oye, tú! (Spain) ¡Cállate y sal de aquí!
¡Oiga, usted! (S.Am) ¡Cállese y salga de aquí!
And for more than one person:
Excuse me, you two. But I think it's time to leave now
Disculpan, vosotros dos. Pero creo que ya es hora de marcharse
Ok. Let's go, you guys (Am.E)
(Note that US American may refer to males and/or females as "guys" in this type of expression.)
Ok. Let's go you lot (Br.E)
Vámonos, chicos
(All males or males and females)
Vámonos, chicas
(All females)
In today's spoken English "you" is used as an impersonal pronoun or when we mean "people in general". Spanish may do this too or where possible use "se" + verb:
There's so much violence in the world nowadays.
What can you do?
Hay tanta violencia en el mundo hoy en día.
¿Qué se puede hacer? / ¿Qué puedes hacer?
When you're in that situation, you just don't have time to react
Cuando te encuentras en esa situación, no tienes tiempo para reaccionar
Especially in South America, you can hear the use of "uno":
Cuando uno no tiene trabajo. ¿Qué puede hacer uno? (S.Am)
Cuando no tienes trabajo. ¿Qué se puede hacer? (Spain)
When you haven't got a job. What can you do?
As the direct object of a sentence, impersonal "you" is still used in English. In South America the structure is 3rd person "lo" + verb + "a uno" while in Spain it's more common to hear the 2nd person "te" + verb
When somebody attacks you like that from behind. There's nothing you can do about it.
Cuando alguien lo atraca a uno por detrás de esa manera. No hay nada que hacer. (S.Am)
Cuando alguien te atraca por detrás de esa manera. No hay nada que hacer. (Spain)
And impersonal "you" as an indirect object follows the same rules but in South American Spanish we use the indirect object pronoun: "le":
They tell you the cheque (Am.E check) is on it's way but it always takes ages to arrive
Le dicen a uno que el cheque está en camino pero siempre tarda muchísimo en llegar (S.Am)
Te dicen que el talón está en camino pero siempre tarda muchísimo en llegar (Spain)